SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.R.AGNIHOTRI, S.KULWANT SINGH
HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
GURDIAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Jagat Narain, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice M.R. Agnihotri, President — This order shall decide two First Appeals No. 245 of 1994 filed by the Haryana State Electricity Board v. Gurdial Singh and First Appeal No. 250 of 1994 filed by Gurdial Singh against the H. S.E.B.; as both of them are against the same impugned order dated 30th March, 1994 passed by the District Forum, Ambala.

2. Complainant Gurdial Singh owned agricultural land in Village Rattanheri, Tehsil & Distt. Ambala, in which he had a tubewell installed with a motor of 5 BHP. In course of time, as the H.S.E.B had to release electricity connections to number of other tubewells in the surrounding fields, the voltage went down and finding the electricity supply inadequate, Gurdial Singh-complainant of his own replaced the 5 BHP motor with 15 BHP motor and finally with 20 BHP motor. Since the transformer could not supply sufficient energy to the complainant to cope with the additional load, he approached the H.S.E.B. authorities for installation of a new transformer. The work of installation of the new transformer started on 17th of August, 1991 and completed on 14th of December, 1991 but this was not to the satisfaction of the complainant, where upon








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top