SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAM LAL GUPTA, GURKANWAL KAUR, A.L.BAHRI
BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Appellant
Versus
NAVNEET KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant:Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ram Lal Aneja, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice A.L. Bahri, President—Vide this order two appeals being F.A. No. 61/96 and F.A. No. 215 of 1996 are for disposal. Both these appeals have been filed by the Board of Secondary Education, Madhya Pradesh Bhopal and the respondent is Navneet Kumar, the complainant. Appeal No. 61 of 1996 has been filed against the order of the District Forum dated 9.1.96 whereby the application filed by the Board for setting aside the ex parte order was dismissed. Appeal No. 215/96 has been filed by the Board against order dated August 1,1995 whereby the District Forum granted relief to the complainant directing the appellant-board to pay sum of Rs. 10,000/- as damages and a sum of Rs. 1,000/- as costs.

2. Navneet Kumar filed the complaint before the District Forum against the Board as well as the Principal Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Bairagarh, Bhopal. Earlier Navneet Kumar appeared in 10+2 examination conducted by the Board but failed. He applied for re-evaluation/re-counting of the marks. Finding no response, he approached the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in 1992. The writ petition was ultimately dismissed. Subsequently, he submitted an application for appeari








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top