A.L.BAHRI, RAM LAL GUPTA
KHANNA ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
MANJEET SINGH – Respondent
Mr. Ram Lal Gupta, Member — Agitated by the order of the District Forum, Ropar dated 25.4.96, the appellant before us is the opposite party before the District Forum. In our order, we shall be referring the parties as they were before the District Forum i.e. appellant as opposite party and the respondent as complainant.
2. The complainant who has done his B.D.S. course in the year 1992 and got a loan of Rs. 1,00,000/- sanctioned from the Scheduled Caste Finance Corporation approached the opposite party-M/s. Khanna Enterprises, Chandigarh for supply of the Dental X-ray machine alongwith Dental chair (Confident's Compact Clinic with attached unit) and other material. Vide Ex. A/12 dated 3.6.93 the opposite party issued the quotation to the complainant mentioning the rates of the material cited therein and for the disposal of this appeal only the rates of dental chair with attached unit (Confident Compact Clinic) are relevant and the rate of the said dental chair had been quoted to be Rs. 35,000/- and the full sale price of the material to be supplied vide quotation is Rs. 1,06,000/- and as per terms and conditions of the quotation the rates of goods are F.O.R. destination. Ex. A/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.