VITHAL RAO, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU
P. M. ASHWIN – Appellant
Versus
MANIPAL HOSPITAL, BANGALORE – Respondent
Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President — In this complaint, under Section 17 r/w Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complainants have sought compensation in a sum of Rs. 12,50,000/- from the opposite parties.
Complainant No. 1 is a minor under the guardianship of complainants 2 and 3-parents. Opposite parties 1 and 2 are the Managing Director and Medical Director respectively of M/S. Manipal Hospital, Bangalore; opposite party Nos. 3 & 4 are a Paediatric Surgeon an Anaesthesiologist at Manipal Hospital, Bangaloe. Pending enquiry, Opposite Party Nos. 5 and 8 expired. Opposite Party No. 6 is a Chief Anaesthesiologist, Opposite Party No. 7 a Doctor and Opposite Party No. 9 is a Nurse in O.T. of Manipal Hospital, Bangalore.
2. Complainant No. 1 was born on 13.1.92; the parents of C-l, that is, C-2 and C-3, took the baby to Opposite Party 3 the Paediatric Surgeon at Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, on 26.2.92. Opposite Party No. 3 examined the baby and diagnosed as having inguinal hernia on the right side and has advised immediate surgery. Complain- ants 2 and 3 got C-1, when he was 65 days old, admitted in the Opposite Party hospital on 19.3.92 for hernia surgery. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.