JATIN P.VAIDYA, R.C.MANKAD
NATIONAL CONSUMER PROTECTION COUNCIL – Appellant
Versus
POORVADEEP CORPORATION – Respondent
Mr. Justice R.C. Mankad, President — These complaints which involve common questions of law and facts have been consolidated at the request of the parties to these complaints and common evidence is recorded in complaint No. 51 of 1990. Since common questions are involved in these complaints, they are disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Facts giving rise to these complaints are as follows: One Vasudev Lallubhai Dalwadi and others owned land bearing. Survey Numbers 352/1 to 352/3 of Rakhial admeasuring 14610 sq. mts. The owners of the land obtained sanction of Competent Authority under the Urban Land Ceiling Act for construction of houses for persons belonging to weaker section of the Society. Under the scheme, price of each residential unit of C type was fixed at Rs. 27,000/-. It is alleged that opponent No. 1 M/s. Poorvadeep Corporation (Corporation for short), a partnership-firm, entered into an agreement with the owners of the land to develop the land and to organize housing scheme for persons belonging to weaker section of the Society under the sanction given by the Competent Authority. The Corporation framed and organized housing scheme consisting of apartments/flats. S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.