SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.R.AGNIHOTRI, SUSHIL PAUL
UNION BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
AMAR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Pradeep Bedi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. R.M. Singh, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice M.R. Agnihotri, President— Union Bank of India has come up in appeal against the order dated 8th December, 1995 passed by learned District Forum, Kamal, whereby complaint filed by one Amar Singh, a Medical Practitioner of Karnal has been allowed and the appellant Bank has been directed to charge interest @ 15.5% per annum on the loan advanced to the complainant for the purchase of a Maruti Car, under "Professional and Self Employed Scheme of the Bank." According to the complainant the loan of Rs. 1,20,000/-was sanctioned to him by the Bank on 18th November, 1993 for the purchase of Maruti Car and according to the letter of allotment interest @ 15.5% was to be charged from him. However a couple of months later he received a letter that the policy of the Bank had since been revised and as per the new policy rate of interest chargeable would be 18.5% on the amount of loan. Aggrieved against this, the complainant approached the District Forum and in reply thereto, the Bank pleaded that the rate of interest @ 15.5% had been mentioned by the Bank official concerned by mistake, which was later detected and brought to the notice of the complainant. Learned District Forum




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top