SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PULAVAR, V.S.KANDASAMY, E.J.BELLIE, ANGEL ARULRAJ
V. HALAYSA SUNDARAM – Appellant
Versus
BEST & CROMPTON ENGG. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In person.
For the Respondent:Thiru Franco Louis, Advocate.

ORDER

Thiru Justice E.J. Bellie, President—When the matter was called, there was no representation for the appellant/complainant. The case of the complainant was that he and his wife made deposits of Rs. 15,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- respectively with the opposite party Company. Even after the maturity of these deposits the Company has not paid these amounts with interest thereon. On these allegations the complaint has been filed seeking an order for refund of the deposit amounts and also interest @ 15% p.a.

2. The opposite parties contested the matter simply stating that it is in financial difficulty and after some time when the financial position improved they would pay the amounts.

3. The District Forum Held that there was deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party in not paying the deposit amounts and it passed an order directing the opposite party to pay to the complainant the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with interest thereon @ 15% p.a. from the dates of deposits till payment. It is against this order the complainant has filed the appeal.

4. Now in the appeal it is stated that the District Forum should have ordered payment of compensation for the mental sufferings and for damages




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top