SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SADA NAND, P.OJHA, J.B.GARG
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – Appellant
Versus
RANBIR KAUR – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice J.B. Garg, President—Ranbir Kaur and Dalbir Kaur possessed joint Savings Bank Account No. 18707 in Punjab National Bank, Sector 16, Chandigarh. A sum of Rs. 39,925/was disbursed to them by means of voucher by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh on 18.7.91. This voucher was presented by the aforesaid two ladies to the Punjab National Bank, Sector 16, Chandigarh for collection and crediting to their Savings Bank Account. It appears that the voucher was lost either in transit or at the premises of the main office of Punjab National Bank, Sector 17, Chandigarh. The amount in question was credited after a delay of 2 years 11 months 20 days on 7.7.94. On a complaint instituted it has been ordered by the District Forum, Union Territory, Chandigarh on 11.10.96 that the complainants are entitled to interest @ 18% p.a. for the aforesaid period of delay. Aggrieved against it, the present appeal has been attempted.

2. On behalf of the appellant it has been argued that there was no wilful delay because the voucher was lost either in transit or at the premises of main office of the appellant-Bank. On behalf of the respondents it has been told that Col. G.S. Gill, retired b




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top