P.C.MISHRA, MRINALINI PADHI, BISWANATH RATH
GHANASHYAM PATEL – Appellant
Versus
RENUKA SHARMA – Respondent
Mr. Justice P.C. Misra, President—The appellant has filed this appeal in person, but does not appear today when the case is called for hearing. The respondents have not appeared though noticed. We examined the records of the District Forum (C.D. Case No. 6/95 before the District Forum, Sambalpur) and perused the impugned order. In the circumstances, we proceed to dispose of this appeal in the absence of both parties.
2. The complainant in C.D. Case No. 6 of 1995 of the District Forum, Sambalpur is the appellant in this appeal. The complainant appellant is an Advocate who had appeared for one Dr. H.B. Khorana in H.R.C. Misc. Case No. 4 of 1988 pending in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate-cum-House Rent Controller, Sambalpur. He filed a copy application praying for urgent certified copy of the deposition of one Saroj Manjari Devi in the said case. He has stated that the said certified copy was necessary to be filed before the Hon'ble High Court in a pending writ application, that is, O.J.C. No. 3510 of 1994. According to him, the urgent certified copy was to be given to him on the same day or on the day following. But he was not supplied with the copy upto 5 p.m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.