Mr. Justice V.K. Mehrotra, President— The complainant performed some work for the opposite parties 1 and 2 (Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. and the Chief .Project/Senior Project Manager of the Hindustan Steel Works) under some contractual terms in pursuance whereof a letter of intent had also been issued by these opposite parties. The case of the complainant is that initially there was an arbitration clause in the agreement but subsequently it was (deleted. The complainant was made to undertake some extra work for which payment is not being made by these opposite parties. As such; he had to approach the State Commission for relief through, represent complainant

2. The grayer clause contains two principal reliefs which the complainant expects to get from the Commission First, that the first, two opposite parties may be directed to pay the entire amount of Rs. 18,44,000/-to the complainant as per the terms of the contact and, secondly, that the third opposite party,(Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Shakti Nagar, Sonebhadra) be directed not to proceed with the recovery proceedings against the complainant who has a current account with it

3. On the own allegation of the c