SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SADA NAND, J.B.GARG
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
PROMILA VERMA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice J.B. Garg, President—Haryana Urban Development Authority sold Plot No. 1318, Sector 21, Gurgaon to Smt. Promila Verma w/o Sqn. Ldr. P.K. Verma on 15.11.1985 and the details of the price paid totalling Rs. 84,988.15 have been given in para 3 of the complaint. The possession of the plot was not delivered because the land in question was found to be a disputed property and some litigation between Haryana Urban Development Authority and private owners of the land was stated to be pending. Thereafter, the Haryana Urban Development Authority allotted a Plot No. 161, Sector 5, Gurgaon in lieu of the originally allotted plot but it started demanding price @ Rs. 2,139.89 per sq. meter. The District Forum, Union Territory, Chandigarh, on 11.4.1997 ordered that the price payable by the allottee shall be at the old rate of Rs. 66.12 per sq. meter and also held that complainant shall be entitled to interest @ 18% p.a. on the price deposited till date of delivery of possession of the new plot. Besides this a sum of Rs. 30,000/ on account of expenses incurred on the journies involving the personal visits, correspondence etc. and another sum of Rs. 30,000/ as compensation for the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top