Mr. Justice Malik Sharief-ud-Din, President—The complainant was financed by the opposite party. We have waited enough there is no appearance for the complainant. The Order Sheet will reveal that the complainant occasionally would not appear.

2. The complainant had purchased a truck No. 9721/JKB for which it was financed by the opposite party. It appears from the contents of the complaint as well as from the objections raised by the opposite party that this vehicle was seized by the O.P. on the ground that the complainant failed to make the payments of instalments under the contract of Hire Purchase Agreement between the parties. Under the agreement the truck till the loan is liquidated in essence remains the property of the Financier- opposite party herein. The complainant has tried to bring him his case within the scope of the Consumer Protection Act by stating that the opposite party has failed to provide proper services but he has not stand that pursuant to the Hire Purchase Agreement the instalments were paid regularly and that he had not made any default in the payment of instalments under the agreements. He has further suppressed the fact from us that on the same facts he