Mr. Justice Malik Sharief-ud-Din, President—Though not spelt out in so many terms in the complaint as to when the cause of action arose to the complainant it is clear from para 7 of the complaint wherein reference to certain receipts has been made that this transaction dates back to the year 1966. The case of the complainant in short is that he was trapped by the non-applicants in making an offer of selling plots in a particular area of New Delhi pursuant to which an agreement was entered into between the parties and he was offered a plot of land number 458 Block-D at Rs. 20/- per sq. feet on a monthly instalment of Rs. 80/- and pursuant to this agree men the started paying the instalments some of which were paid through cheques for which receipts was issued. Subsequently, the plot number was changed and an alternate plot allotted. His case is that after a considerable period of time that the whole transaction was fraudalent and the opposite party No. 1 has handed over the management of the said Company to opposite party No. 2 without informing him. His case is that the opposite party No. 2 even though having knowledge that he was one of the allottees have deprived him of the