SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MONORANJAN GHOSH, S.DUTTA, A.K.BHATTACHARJEE
T. D. E, BANKURA DIVISION, BANKURA – Appellant
Versus
G. SINGHANIA – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice A.K. Bhattacharjee, President— This is an appeal against an order of the District Forum, Purulia, allowing a petition of complaint filed before it by the respondent-complainant. The complainant's case is that a Telegram was booked from Calcutta on 10.2.93 intimating that a press conference which was to be held at Calcutta on 15.2.1993 was postponed. The Telegram was to reach the destination at Raghunathpur within a few hours but it was actually delivered to the addressee by post after 117hours. The complainant's case is that he had already left for Calcutta on 14.2.1993 by night train after having the reservation on 11.2.1993. His contention is that had the Telegram reached in time, he could have avoided the expenditure and strain of the journey. Again on 4.3.1993, the same person from Calcutta booked an urgent Telegram to the complainant communicating information that the relevant press conference would be held on the 10th March, 1993. The Telegram actually reached the complainant late on 9.3.1993. The complainant's allegation is that he could not attend the press conference on 10.3.1993 and it has caused agony to him and lowered his reputation in the eyes of the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top