SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.R.AGNIHOTRI, SUSHIL PAUL
HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR BANSAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : None.
For the Respondent No. 1:Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice M.R. Agnihotri, President— Haryana Financial Corporation has come up in appeal against the order dated 26th July, 1994 passed by learned District Forum. Hisar, whereby complaint of cue Sunil Kumar Bansal alleging deficiency in service has been allowed.

2. According to the complainant he got a Turbo Telco Truck for being plied throughout the country with a National Permit. For the purchase of this truck he applied for the loan to the Haryana Financial Corporation, which was duly sanctioned, but the Corporation released only a sum of Rs. 3,16,800/- as against Rs. 3,93,000/-. Later on even though the certificate of the fitness of the truck was valid upto 3rd October, 1994 and the Registering Authority, Fatehabad extended the validity of registration upto 9th September, 1995, yet due to some communication written by the appellant-Haryana Financial Corporation, the truck was not allowed to be plied. As the truck remained idle, the complainant suffered a loss of Rs. 40,000/- per month, which was the only source of livelihood of the complainant. On he other hand, Haryana Financial Corporation pleaded that the letter in question was written to the Regional Transport Authori





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top