SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.KULWANT SINGH, M.R.AGNIHOTRI
DARSHNI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
RAJESHWAR PARSHAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajiv Bhalla, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice M.R. Agnihotri, President— Smt. Darshni Devi complainant has come up in appeal against the order dated 5th August, 1994 passed by learned District Forum, Karnal, whereby her complaint against Dr. Rajeshwar Parshad alleging deficiency in service while treating her, has been dismissed as without any evidence.

2. According to the complainant she approached the respondent-Dr. Rajeshwar Parshad, M.B.B.S. MS (PGI), FRCS, Canada, in his Nursing Home at Karnal on 16th October, 1992, as she had experienced some pain in the arm joint. The Doctor attended her for number of days and thereafter referred her for proper advice to P.G.I, with letter addressed to Dr. S.K. Khanna of P.G.I. Ultimately on 16th November, 1992 in the P.G.I, after conducting various tests her right fore-arm had been amputated. On the basis of this happening the complainant approached the District Forum claiming compensation against the respondent. In his reply. Dr. Rajeshwar Parshad admitted that the complainant remained under his treatment but pleaded, that there was no negligence on his part at any stage as he was fully qualified and experienced Doctor and had applied all possible care and caution in tr



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top