SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.P.CHOWDHRI, DESH BANDHU AGGARWAL
ASSTT. ENGINEER, SUB-DIVISION IV, CPWD – Appellant
Versus
C. D. JHA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajesh Saxena, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice A.P. Chowdhri, President — Mr. C.D. Jha, who was complainant before the District Forum-II, was a Government employee. He was living in Quarter No. 551, Sector IX, R.K. Puram, New Delhi, allotted to him by the Government on payment of licence fee. On 8.12.1991 at about 4.30 p.m. a portion of the ceiling approximately one metre in diameter and 2 inches thick fell down in the kitchen, resulting in damage of some utensils, etc. lying there. He lodged a report with the CPWD Enquiry, Sector IX, who were responsible for maintenance and upkeep of the Quarter. Repairs were carried out after one year on 19.12.1992. He filed a complaint for compensation on account of damage suffered by him. The case was contested. On a consideration of the material before it. District Forum-II held that the complainant was 'consumer' as defined in the Consumer Protection Act, that the incident took place on account of poor maintenance. In the facts and circumstances, the District Forum determined the compensation to be Rs. 2,000/- including costs of the proceedings and accordingly/directed the opposite parties to pay the said amount. Aggrieved by the order the opposite parties have preferred







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top