Mr. Justice J.B. Garg, President — Dr. Pawan Sharma is a subscriber to telephone No. 531234. The disputed bill of February and April, 1992 which were for Rs. 1,239/- and 5,021/- have been dealt with in judgment dated 4.9.1997 of the District Forum-II, Chandigarh. In the present appeal. Dr. Pawan Sharma has challenged the bill for 8/92 for a sum of Rs. 9,564/-. It is obvious that this particular bill was neither in question nor dealt with in the judgment dated 4.9.1997. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that the present bill relates to judgment dated 4.9.1997 and obviously no interference is called for in the aforesaid judgment.

2. During the course of arguments, it has transpired that Dr. Pawan Sharma was aggrieved in respect of his bill dated 29.8.1992 which was for a sum of Rs. 9,564/-. In this regard, he had instituted his Complaint No. 702/92. It appears that it was dismissed for non-prosecution on 13.7.1994 because none was present for the complainant. The complainant may like to seek any remedy, if admissible, in respect of the aforesaid order.

The conclusion is that the present appeal challenging the order dated 4.9.1997 stands dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.