SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SAROJ RAJWADE, N.K.VAIDYA
BHOLARAM SEN – Appellant
Versus
BHARTIYA JEEWAN BIMA NIGAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Hakim Khan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Somesh Garg, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. N.K. Vaidya, Member — This is an appeal against the order dated 9.9.1997 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jabalpur in their Case No. 362/93, wherein the Forum has dismissed the complaint stating further that the complainant if he desires, may file a suit in Civil Court.

2. Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the records of the case.

3. The undisputed facts of the case in brief are as under:

(i) That the complainant's wife Smt. Gomti Bai had taken one LIC Policy No. 370356766 for Rs. 50,000/-on her life on 20.7.1992 and she died on 4.10.1992 at about 8.45 p.m.

(ii) That respondent-LIC repudiated the claim of the complainant (nominee) vide their letter No. DC-1/Repdt/1/ 94/95 dated 11.8.1994 stating that she withheld the material information regarding her being pregnant at the time of effecting the assurance with UC and also made incorrect statement about her husband's policy that it was for Rs. 50,000/- and was effective. That the LIC held indisputable proof to show that she was pregnant at the time she proposed for above insurance and that her husband's policy was for only Rs. 20,000/- and not Rs. 50,000/- and was in lapsed condi



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top