SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.P.CHOWDHRI, DESH BANDHU AGGARWAL
RAGINI RAMCHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
PUSHPA BUILDERS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Applicant :Mr. Harish Uppal, Advocate.
For the Non-Applicant : In Person.

ORDER

Mr. Justice A.P. Chowdhri, President— This order will dispose of Miscellaneous Application dated 30th April, 1998. In order to appreciate the points raised, it is necessary to set- out the background briefly as follows.

2. Smt. Ragini Ramchandran and her husband booked a flat in Pushpa Akash Apartment, which was undertaken to be built by M/s. Pushpa Builders Limited. The complainants spaid certain amounts from time to time. The builder, however, failed to complete the construction and deliver possession of the flat booked by the complainants. The complainants, therefore, filed a complaint registered as C-615/ 93. The opposite party M/s. Pushpa Builders Limited contested the claim of the complainants. By order dated 14.2.1997, the complaint was allowed and the opposite party directed to refund Rs. 3,09,228/- besides 18% interest thereon from the date of deposit till date of refund and Rs. 3,000/-as costs. No appeal appears to have been filed against the order of the State Commission which became final between the parties. The opposite parties failed to pay the amount and the complainants were obliged to file an application under Sections 25/27of the Consumer Protection Act regis


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top