SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.SHAMSUDDIN, K.MADHURI LATHA
CANARA BANK – Appellant
Versus
C. APPU – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. P. Balakrishnan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. K.K. Bhavadass Menon, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice P.K. Shamsuddin, President — This appeal is directed against the order passed by the District Forum, Palakkad in O.P. No. 583 of 1996. The opposite parties are the appellants. The case of the complainant is that he has availed of a loan of Rs. 15,000/- from the opposite party Bank on execution of a promissory note on 18.10.1988 in favour of the Bank and he deposited the original sale deed of an immovable property owned by him by way of security. The complainant could not repay the loan installment and the first opposite party filed a Suit No. 536/ 1991 and obtained a decree and E.P. 17/95 was filed to recover the decree amount from the complainant and the EP was closed on 23.8.1996 on payment of full amount. However the opposite party did not return the documents which according to the complainant would amount to deficiency in service.

2. The opposite party filed a version stating that there are two other loans and the document was deposited not only byway of security for the loan mentioned, but also two other loans outstanding and therefore they are not bound to return the document.

3. The District Forum found that the document was deposited in regard to this loan a




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top