SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.DUBEY, SAROJ RAJWADE
ADHIKSHAK, DAK GHAR – Appellant
Versus
RHADESH MOHAN TRIPATHI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. K.K. Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Rampal Singh, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice S.K. Dubey, President—This is an appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the 'Act') against the order dated 30.11.1996 passed in Case No. 256/1996 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Rewa (for short the 'District Forum').

2. Undisputed facts are thus that on 16.11.1994 the complainant sent a registered AD parcel No. 1852 through Rewa Bainkat Bhawan Dakghar to one Laxminarain Pathak, Soni Colony, Guna which was lost in transit. The complainant vide applications dated 15.4.1996/17.7.1996 claimed compensation. The Postal Authorities claimed immunity under Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (for short the 'Act of 1898'). However, on compassionate ground ordered for payment of Rs. 100/- to which the complainant did not agree. The complainant filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act and claimed Rs. 1,000/- the cost of KG Wool sent by registered parcel and Rs. 10,000/- as compensation for harassment, physical and mental pain. The claim was contested by the opposite party. The District Forum after considering the material on record awarded Rs. 1,000/- as the cost of the contents of the parcel and Rs. 150/- as co













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top