SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Mr. Tejinder Singh Doabia & Mr. Arun Kumar Goel, JJ.
GHULAM ALI AZAD—Appellant
versus
BRANCH MANAGER,
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.—Respondents
C.I.M.A. No. 20 of 1998—Decided on 7.7.1999

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. I.H. Bhat, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate.

The insurance company is bound to settle the claim subject to conditions and deductions, and the appellant must fulfill formalities and provide documents for the settlement of the theft claim.

Headnote:

Insurance Claim - Vehicle Insurance - The court held the insurance company bound to the suggestion made by it for the settlement of the claim, subject to certain conditions and deductions.

Fact of the Case:

Two claims were lodged for the same vehicle - one for theft and the other for an accident. The insurance company agreed to pay a sum for the accident claim, subject to conditions and the availability of original bills and salvage. The claim could not be settled due to the complainant's remissness.

Finding of the Court:

The court held the insurance company bound to the suggestion made by it for the settlement of the claim, subject to conditions and deductions. The appellant was required to fulfill certain formalities and provide documents for the settlement of the theft claim.

Issues: Dispute over settlement of insurance claims for theft and accident, availability of original bills and salvage, and the appellant's remissness in fulfilling the requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found the insurance company bound to settle the accident claim, subject to conditions and deductions, and required the appellant to fulfill formalities and provide documents for the settlement of the theft claim.

Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of with the insurance company being held bound to settle the accident claim, subject to conditions and deductions, and the appellant being required to fulfill formalities and provide documents for the settlement of the theft claim.

ORDER

Mr. Tejinder Singh Doabia, J.—Regarding the same vehicle, two claims were lodged, one was with regard to the theft and the other was with regard to an accident. The theft took place first and the accident took place later on. Vis-a-vis the claim of the accident, the Company agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 42,786/-. This was subject to the condition that the policy and the salvage is made available by the appellant to the Insurance Company. The requirement to furnish original bills was also insisted upon. As this was not done, the Commission has come to the conclusion that on account of remissness on the part of complainant, the claim could not be settled.

2. As the Company was ready and willing to settle the claim for Rs. 42,786/-, therefore, we are of the opinion that the ends of justice would be served if the Company is held bound to the suggestion made by it for the settlement of the claim.

3. It be seen that the vehicle is not available. Its salvage would naturally be not available. Therefore, that much amount which the Company would have got by way of salvage be deducted from the amount for which the claim was settled. We fix this amount as Rs. 10,000/-. The Insurance Company would accordingly pay an amount of Rs. 32,786/- to the complainant. This would, however, be subject to the furnishing of original bills by the appellant-complainant. So far as policy is concerned, that may also be not available because it is normally kept in the vehicle. The appellant would, therefore, furnish an indemnity bond so that the Company is not involved in any other litigation in this regard. So far as theft is concerned, this is yet to be settled by the Company. In this regard, the appellant shall make available all the required documents as indicated by the Insurance Company. On this being done, the needful be done within a period of one month from the date, the requisite formalities are completed by the appellant-complainant. The accidental claim which has been settled be disbursed to the appellant Company within a period of one month from the date conditions indicated by the Company are fulfilled. The appellant would, however, be not entitled to interest. This is because on account of his own remissness, the claim could not be settled.

This appeal is accordingly disposed of in the manner indicated above.

Appeal disposed of.

_



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top