SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.C.BHARGAVA, D.D.BAHUGUNA
AVADH WOOD PRODUCTS – Appellant
Versus
DEENA NATH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. M.H. Khan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice K.C. Bhargava, President— This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 10.3.1999 passed by District Consumer Forum, Bahraich in Complaint Case No. 133/1997. The complainant prayed for claim for price of the potatoes which the appellant failed to deliver back alongwith damage.

2. The facts of the case stated in brief are that the complainant kept 296 bags of potatoes on 29.3.1996 and 175 bags of potatoes on 1.4.1996 weighing 322 quintals and 77 kgs. When the complainant went to take back the potatoes he found that the same was rotten and he took delivery of all the potatoes bags on 18.5.1999.196 bags of potatoes were not returned to the complainant. At the rate of Rs. 425/- per quintal the complainant is entitled to cost of potatoes of Rs. 1,37,227.25. Opposite party filed a written statement and has argued that on account of failure of electricity and non-availability of diesel in appropriate quantity the cold storage could not run properly.

3. The learned District Forum, after considering the evidence on record came to the conclusion that the complainant is entitled to claim a sum of Rs. 1,37,227.25 as cost of the potatoes alongwith Rs. 500/- as cost. It a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top