SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.K.BHAMRAH, A.L.BAHRI, JASBIR SINGH
PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH CHANDER – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. C.M. Makkar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Nemo.

ORDER

Mr. Justice A.L. Bahri, President—This appeal is by PUDA challenging order of District Forum, Ludhiana dated April 30, 1997 granting compensation of Rs. 5,000/- and interest @ 18% per annum on the amount of Rs. 17,000/- to Subash Chander the complainant.

2. In 1985 Subash Chander applied for LIG house on deposit of Rs. 1,000/-. On September 30, 1990 one house was allotted to him and he was required to make payment of the balance amount of Rs. 15,797/-. The amount was not deposited within time; extension was sought, which was granted. The amount was paid subsequently. However, the complainant did not take possession of the house as there were some faults; certain amenities were not provided by the PUDA. The complainant thus applied for refund of the amount alongwith interest @ 24% per annum on November 20, 1992. A reminder was also issued. Subsequently, District Forum was approached. The PUDA took up the plea that there was no deficiency in rendering service on their part and the amount could be refunded but with interest @ 10%. The plea did not appeal to the District Forum that the impugned order was passed.

3. In appeal Mr. C.M. Makkar, Advocate for the PUDA has argued that the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top