D.K.BHAMRAH, A.L.BAHRI, JASBIR SINGH
PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH CHANDER – Respondent
Mr. Justice A.L. Bahri, President—This appeal is by PUDA challenging order of District Forum, Ludhiana dated April 30, 1997 granting compensation of Rs. 5,000/- and interest @ 18% per annum on the amount of Rs. 17,000/- to Subash Chander the complainant.
2. In 1985 Subash Chander applied for LIG house on deposit of Rs. 1,000/-. On September 30, 1990 one house was allotted to him and he was required to make payment of the balance amount of Rs. 15,797/-. The amount was not deposited within time; extension was sought, which was granted. The amount was paid subsequently. However, the complainant did not take possession of the house as there were some faults; certain amenities were not provided by the PUDA. The complainant thus applied for refund of the amount alongwith interest @ 24% per annum on November 20, 1992. A reminder was also issued. Subsequently, District Forum was approached. The PUDA took up the plea that there was no deficiency in rendering service on their part and the amount could be refunded but with interest @ 10%. The plea did not appeal to the District Forum that the impugned order was passed.
3. In appeal Mr. C.M. Makkar, Advocate for the PUDA has argued that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.