SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.C.BHARGAVA, D.D.BAHUGUNA
TOP OF FOOD PRODUCTS – Appellant
Versus
MANJU DEVI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Revisionist :Mr. R.K. Awasthi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. B.K. Upadhayay, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. D.D. Bahuguna, Member—This revision has arisen against order dated 12.10.1999, passed by District Consumer Forum, Deoria, in Complaint Case No. 423/99.

2. Facts of the case as stated are as follows :

3. Mrs. Manju Devi, filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum, Deoria, alleging that she is an educated unemployed woman and for her self-employment she contacted the Sales Officer at Deoria of the revisionist on 20.4.1999 and undertook sales in Deoria City of items manufactured by the revisionist. On the same day, she deposited a sum of Rs. 3,000/- with the Sales Officer, referred above, at Deoria and the revisionist sent goods worth Rs. 5,081/- on 4.5.1999 from Kanpur through a transport company. The said goods were received by the opposite party Smt. Manju Devi on 6.5.1999. The goods so received were not quality goods with the result that the opposite party could sell items valuing Rs. 247.50 only and the rest of items were sent back by her to the revisionist through a transport company. She, therefore, lodged complaint before the District Consumer Forum, Deoria claiming the remaining amount of Rs. 2,752.50. The revisionist instead of returning the demanded amount,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top