K.MADHURI LATHA, L.MANOHARAN
CONTROL ZEE (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
P. ABDUL SAMAD – Respondent
Mr. Justice L. Manoharan, President—The opposite parties 1 to 3 in O.P. No. 275/94 on the file of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kozhikode are the appellants.
2. The complainant sought for a direction to opposite parties 1 to 3 to refund Rs. 87,800/- through with interest and also for damages of Rs. 50,000/-. The allegation was the opposite parties 1 to 3 received Rs. 63,800/- for supply of a computer, the first opposite party received Rs. 24,500/- for supplying laser printer, and the opposite parties 1 to 3 agreed to supply the same as per the specification in Exbts. A1 and A3 series quotation. The grievance of the complainant was that the computer supplied was not in accordance with the specification as agreed. Consequently the complainant could not functioning the same, therefore, the complainant wanted return of the amount received by the opposite parties. Opposite parties 1 to 3 in their version among other contentions sought to maintain, that the opposite party No. 4 placed an order for a computer, a laser printer and a UPS with them, that the opposite party No. 1 is only a booking agency of M/s. Sterling Computers Pvt. Ltd., Madras who are the manufacturers of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.