SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BANUMATHI BASKARAN, M.S.JANARTHANAM
REVATHY – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainants :Mr. T. Mathi, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties : None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice M.S. Janarthanam, President—This action has come up for admission before us today. We have perused the averments in the complaint and also the documents filed alongwith it. Such perusal reveals the following factors :

(1) The 1st complainant Revathy is the mother of the 2nd complainant M. Indu, Minor. During her pregnancy, it appears, she took treatment with the 1st opposite party-Doctor Chandra who is the Proprietor of the 2nd opposite party-Chandra Hospital. The 2nd complainant was born in the 2nd opposite party-hospital and the doctor in charge of the delivery was the 1st opposite party-Dr. Chandra.

(2) It appears, it is a case of breach.

(3) The child, it appears, was forcibly taken with the uses of forceps without resorting to ceaserian operation.

(4) Because of the baby have been forcibly taken out by means of forceps, it appears, due to internal injury caused in such process, puss had been developed in joints and various portions of the body of the baby.

(5) The baby was operated on various parts of the body for the removal of the puss.

(6) Because of the alleged callous negligence on the part of the 1st opposite party, the 2nd complainant baby was put to fa










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top