SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.C.DATTA, S.MAJUMDAR, D.KARFORMA
GLOBAL TELE SYSTEM LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNIQUE SALES AGENCY – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice S.C. Datta, President—This appeal is directed against order dated 2.2.1998 passed by Calcutta District Forum, Unit-I, whereby the complaint petition was allowed with a direction to the opposite party to deliver one Maruti 800 car to the complainant/Unit Sales Agency within a month from the date of the order. There has been a further order for payment of compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,000/-.

2. The facts involved in this case are very short and simple. The complainant is one of the authorised dealers of M/s. Global Tele System Ltd. On 15.4.1996 the opposite party floated Lucky Bird Contest for its dealers and a public advertisement was issued thereafter. The complainant received the Circular in this regard on 6.5.1996. In the advertisement the dealers were urged to purchase 15 Fax Machines for one Coupon between 20.4.1996 and 30.5.1996. This was one of the conditions to become eligible and qualified to be a participant in the Draw to be held thereafter. The decision to declare the winner in the Draw rested solely upon the opposite party. It was inter alia assured that one Maruti 800 car will be given to the owner on the spot or within the next three months thereaf













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top