SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUCKNOW
Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.C. Bhargava, President &
Mr. D.D. Bahuguna, Member
MANAGING DIRECTOR, KHAITAN HOSTOMBE SPINELS
LIMITED & ANR.—Appellants
versus
SUNDER DEVI & ORS.—Respondents
Appeal No. 3200/SC of 1994—Decided on 27.11.2000

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. M.H. Khan, Advocate.

Failure to file an appeal within the prescribed time period leads to dismissal of the appeal.

Headnote:

Consumer Protection Act - Share Transfer Dispute - The court dismissed the appeal against the judgment and order passed by the District Consumer Forum, Shahjahanpur, holding that the appeal was barred by limitation.

Fact of the Case:

The complainant purchased shares, sent them to the opposite party for transfer, and despite completing required formalities, the shares were not transferred, resulting in deprivation of dividends. The District Consumer Forum awarded compensation to the complainant.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appeal was barred by limitation as the appellant failed to file the appeal within 30 days of knowing about the ex-parte judgment, and the time spent in deciding the application for setting aside the ex-parte order could not be excluded from the period of limitation.

Issues: Barred by limitation, failure to file appeal within the prescribed time.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellant failed to file the appeal within the prescribed time, and the time spent in deciding the application for setting aside the ex-parte order could not be excluded from the period of limitation.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation with a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be paid within two months.

ORDER

Mr. Justice K.C. Bhargava, President—This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 25.6.1994 passed by District Consumer Forum, Shahjahanpur in Complaint Case No. 120/1994.

2. The facts of the case stated in brief are that the complainant had purchased 300 Shares on 24.12.1991 after paying a sum of Rs. 7,170/-. These shares were sent through Courier on 15.4.1992 to the opposite parties. The opposite party received the shares but did not take any action for transfer of the shares in the name of the complainant. Reminder was also issued on 18.1.1993 and a notice dated 26.8.1993 was also served on opposite party informing them that a complaint lodged with Sewa, Bombay which was registered by the Security of Exchange Board of India. The opposite party also did not take any action. By letter dated 14.6.1993, the opposite parties informed that the share certificates had been lost and affidavit and indemnity bond in prescribed form was required to be submitted. These formalities were completed by the complainant on 27.7.1993 and 1.9.1993. Even after complying the formalities, the share certificates have not been transferred, as such the complainant was deprived of the dividend from 1992 to 1994. The complainant has claimed compensation. The opposite parties, after service of notice did not file any written statement.

3. The learned District Consumer Forum, after considering the case of the parties, creed the claim for Rs. 7,170/ as the cost of the shares with 12% per annum interest there on from 5.4.1992 till the date of payment. A an of Rs. 5,000/-. as exemplary damages and 5,500/- as cost was also awarded.

4. Aggrieved against the order of the learned District Forum, the appellant has come in appeal and has challenged the correctness of the order passed by the District Forum.

5. We have heard the learned Counsels for the parties. The learned Counsel for the opposite party has raised preliminary objection that the appeal is barred by time. The appellant has moved an application for condonation of delay alleging therein that an ex-parte judgment has been passed on 25.6.1994. The appellant received notice dated 28.7.1994 under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act on 16.8.1994 and for the first time came to know that an ex-parte order sheen passed. It is alleged that no notice was received by him. An application was sent on 26.8,1994 to the District Consumer Forum by registered post under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code for setting aside the ex-parte order dated 25.6.1994. When the appellant went to the District Consumer Forum, Shahjahanpur in December, 1994 to make the enquiries, he came to know that the application has been dismissed on 19/21.11.1994 without giving opportunity of hearing to the appellant. Thereafter the appellant took the copy of the judgment dated 19/21.11.1994 and filed the present appeal. Alongwith this application, an affidavit has been filed.

6. A perusal of the application for condonation of delay will go to show that the appellant for the first time came to know about the ex-parte judgment and order dated 25.6.1994 16,8.1994 when the notice under Section 27 of (Consumer Protection Act was served on him. When the notice has been served on 16.8.1994, appellant should have filed the appeal within days after obtaining the certified copy of the judgment from the District Forum. The appellant applied for the certified copy on 17.12.1994 and the same was delivered to him on the same day. Why the appellant took so much time in obtaining the certified copy of the judgment has not been explained. The appellant could have obtained the certified copy of the judgment immediately on coming to know on 16.8.1994 about the ex- parte judgment. He waited for full four months for obtaining the copy of the judgment. Thus, we find that the appellant came to know of the judgment on 16.8.1994 and he should have filed the appeal within 30 days of this date. As the appeal has been filed on 19.12.1994, the same is







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top