SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.B.KOSHY
ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL – Appellant
Versus
JIMMY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J.B. Koshy, J.—Petitioner is the Director of a hospital. First respondent filed a complaint against the hospital before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur regarding the treatment of his wife late Simi. A notice was issued on 17.2.1999 to the hospital showing the posting date of the case as 14.4.1999. But 14.4.1999 was declared as a holiday and the case was taken up on 16.4.1999 and the petitioner was declared ex-parte. Aggrieved by the above, petitioner filed an application for setting aside the ex-parte order under Order IX, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure. That was rejected by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur by Ext. P6. Against the above order this writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Since the order challenged in this petition is the order of the Tribunal, Article 227 will only apply in this case. The procedure in respect of a complaint is specifically mentioned in Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act. There is no power for the Forum to declare ex-parte or pass an order or take a decision ex-parte under the above Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act. But power is given to the District For











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top