SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.C.DATTA, S.MAJUMDAR, D.KARFORMA
V. S. D. CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
RADHA KRISHNA CHATTOPADHYAY – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice S.C. Datta, President—On request the matter is taken up for final hearing. The appellant has filed a petition praying for stay of Warrant of Arrest issued by the Forum directing the O.C. Here Street, P.S. to execute to Warrant of Arrest against the appellant and to submit execution report by 14.6.2001. This led the appellant to file a put up petition praying for stay operation of the impugned order dated 4.6.2001. Since the matter is very urgent we have taken up the matter for final hearing, with the consent of the parties.

2. It appears that the complainant purchased a Computer from the opposite party for valuable consideration. But ever since the purchase it was giving trouble to him. The complainant made repeated representation to the opposite party for rectifying the defects but without any results. The complainant approached the Forum praying for a direction upon the opposite party for refund of consideration money and for compensation.

3. It appears that the opposite party entered appearance before the Forum by filing written statement. It also appears from the impugned order that on several occasions the opposite party has come to represent and on their prayer


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top