SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.P.WADHWA, C.L.CHAUDHRY, RAJYALAKSHMI RAO, B.K.TAIMNI
V. N. PURI – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN AIRLINES CORPN. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner: In person.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa, President— Petitioner was the complainant. He complained about the deficiency of service of respondent- Airlines. He claimed not only the refund of the value of the air ticket purchased by him but also compensation of Rs. 60,000/-.

2. Complainant on 29.8.1994 was to board flight IA 493 of the respondent at Delhi. The departure time of the flight was 16.45 hrs. After the check-in he had gone through the security. But due to some reason, the flight was delayed and the passengers were requested to await the subsequent announcement. As a matter of fact, the aircraft had to come from some other place and after landing at Delhi, was to take off for Jodhpur, etc. While the complainant was waiting, he remembered that he had forgotten his life saving medicine at home. He, therefore, came out of the security check and again reported for boarding at 17.20 hrs. By this time, flight had been announced for 17.00 hrs. and all the passengers except the complainant have since boarded the aircraft. Complainant could not board the aircraft as by that time Tarmac Officer had already decided to treat the complainant as a case of "Gate No Show" as all the boarding and depart





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top