SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LOKESHWAR PRASAD, RUMNITA MITTAL, S.P.SABERWAL
SWAMI PURUSHOTTAMCHARYA – Appellant
Versus
PREET FREIGHT CARRIER – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In person.
For the Respondents: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Prasad, President—The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), is directed against order dated 24.2.2001, passed by District Forum (North-West), Shalimar Bagh, Delhi in Complaint Case No. 1863/1999 - entitled Swami Purushottamacharya v. M/s. Preet Freight Carrier & Ors.

2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated are, that the appellant had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum, averring that the appellant had engaged the services of respondent No. 3 for transporting his household goods/articles from Mumbai to Delhi. It was stated that respondent No. 3, for the abovesaid purpose, had arranged Truck No. DI 1L C0733, belonging to respondent Nos. 1 and 2. It was further stated, in the complaint, filed by the appellant, that 38 packages, containing household articles, were loaded in the abovesaid truck on 26.6.1999 for being transported from Mumbai to Delhi. It was averred that by mistake, in the challan, issued by respondent No. 3, the number of packages/items was mentioned as ‘36’ instead of ‘38’. Th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top