K.K.SRIVASTAVA, P.K.VASUDEVA, DEVINDERJIT DHATT
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
PREM LAL – Respondent
Mrs. Devinderjit Dhatt, Member—This appeal has been filed by the appellant No. 1, Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (PUDA) through its Estate Officer, Ludhiana and appellant No. 2 Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority through its Chief Administrator against the order dated 11.9.2001 in Complaint Case No. 376/95/Apl.98 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter to be referred as the District Forum-I). The factual matrix narrated briefly is as under :
2. The respondent/complainant, Mr. Prem Lal, resident of SCF 56, Sector 29-D, Chandigarh applied in the year 1983 for 8 Marla residential plot in Sector 32-A, Samrala Road, Ludhiana, Punjab and deposited an amount of Rs. 1,700/- by a demand draft. The same stands acknowledged by appellants/O.Ps. and a copy of the receipt issued has been brought on record vide Annexure C-1. Further an amount of Rs. 2,300/- towards the enhanced amount of the plot was sent by the respondent/complainant on 9.9.1983 (Annexure C-2). As per averments made by the respondent/complainant, inter alia, the appellants/O.Ps. on 6.1.1992 issued a Circular (Annexure C-3) vide which the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.