M.S.RANE, R.N.VARHADI
BABANRAO NARAYAN DESHMUKH – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK GANGARAM SAPKAL – Respondent
Mr. Justice M.S. Rane, President—All these applications are sequel to the common order dated 21st May, 2001 passed by District Forum Buldhana in execution application in respect of main order in the complaints. The execution proceedings were required to be adopted because of the non-compliance of the order. The applicant is common in all five applications who has challenged the order of the District Forum wherein warrant of arrest under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been issued against the applicants. It is to be stated that impugned order in the complaints stands unchallenged. The said order have not been fully complied with. That being so, the issuance of process under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the District Forum cannot be faulted.
2. The learned Advocate for the applicants submitted that now the new Managing Body have taken over the Pat Sanstha which has making efforts to meet the liabilities under the awards. We wish to clarify that the applicant will be at liberty to approach the District Forum Buldhana in this respect and if so did, the Forum shall consider the same on merits.
3. Since, however, as per our interim order dated 29.5.200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.