SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.C.BHARGAVA, D.D.BAHUGUNA, RACHNA
MANAGER, SAHARA INDIA – Appellant
Versus
ASHA DIVEDI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

Mrs. Rachna, Member—This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 12.1.2000 passed by District Consumer Forum, Kanpur Nagar in Complaint Case No. 246/1999.

2. The facts of the case stated in brief are that the complainant had deposited Rs. 10,000/- on 19.1.1995 under the Golden Fixed Deposit Scheme floated by the opposite party, Sahara India for a period of one year i.e. from 19.1.1995 to 18.1.1996. The complainant made several efforts to get her matured amount back but to no avail. Thereafter, she filed a claim before the District Consumer Forum, Kanpur Nagar for getting the maturity amount of Rs. 10,000/- with interest and also claimed compound interest upon the entire amount with effect from 19.1.1999. She also claimed Rs. 5,000/- as compensation and Rs. 1,000/- as cost.

3. Inspite of sufficient notice the opposite parties were not present before the District Forum, hence the case was decided ex-parte by the learned District Forum. The complainant has tendered her original certificate and receipt and filed an affidavit. After perusal of all the documents, the learned District Forum has came to the conclusion that there is deficiency in service on the part of the oppo














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top