The power of appointment includes the power to make an appointment by transfer, subject to satisfying the requirements of the Act. The nature of the functions discharged by the President and Members of District Forum requires them to be insulated from the control of the Executive. The power to transfer the President or Members from one District Forum to another District Forum within the State is available to be exercised on the recommendation of the Committee contemplated by Sub-section (1A) of Section 10 of the Act.

R.C. Lahoti, J.—The questions arising for decision in this appeal are : Whether a President or a Member of the District Forum, constituted under Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter ‘the Act’ for short) can be transferred and, if so, which is the Competent Authority to transfer them? These questions are of significance inasmuch as the answers are likely to have far-reaching implications on the working of District Fora under the Act.

2. Shri Anand Prakash Solanki, the respondent herein, was an officer belonging to the cadre of Rajashtan Higher Judicial Services. In the year 1996, he was working as a Special Judge in the cadre of Addl. District & Sessions Judges in the State of Rajasthan. He was appointed as President, District Consumer Protection Forum, Pali vide order dated 9.2.1996. While he was discharging the function as President of the Forum, sometime in the month of November, 1999 he was informed telephonically by the State Government that he was being transferred and posted as President, District Consumer Protection Forum, Jalore and in his place another person was appointed/posted as the President of the Forum at Pali. This telephonic communication was followed by a written communication dated 15.11.1999 appointing him as President, District Consumer Protection Forum, Banswara in supersession of the earlier orders.

3. The respondent filed a writ petition challenging the order of his transfer. A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court held that the concept of transfer is unknown for the President and Members of District Fora in the Scheme of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and, therefore, a person appointed as President of any District Forum cannot be transferred by the State Government. The order of transfer was directed to be quashed. Feeling aggrieved by the decision of the High Court, the State of Rajasthan has preferred this appeal by special leave. During the pendency of the petition, the respondent has retired and, having lost interest in contesting the matter, he has chosen not to make appearance. We requested Mr. Pallav Sishodia, Advocate, to assist the Court as an amicus curiae, which he agreed to do.

4. We have heard Mr. Ranji Thomas, the learned Counsel for the State of Rajasthan and Mr. Pallav Sishodia, the learned amicus curiae.

Leave granted.

5. A complete hierarchy of Commissions and Fora has been constituted from the national level to the district level by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. There is a National Commission at the national level constituted under Section 20 of the Act and State Commissions constituted for the States under Section 16 of the Act. District Fora are constituted under Section 10 of the Act. These are the three-tier agencies established for the purposes of the Act as contemplated by Section 9. Each State Commission consists of a person, designated as President, who is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court, appointed by the State Government after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court. Then there are the Members. Section 17 confers on the State Commission appellate and supervisory jurisdiction over the District Fora in quasi-judicial matters. Section 24B inserted by Act No. 50 of 1993 w.e.f. 18.6.1993 provides as under :

“24B. Administrative control.—(1) The National Commission shall have administrative control over all the State Commissions in the following matters, namely :

(i) calling for periodical return regarding the institution, disposal, pendency of cases;

(ii) issuance of instructions regarding adoption of uniform procedure in the hearing of matters, prior service of copies of documents produced by one party to the opposite parties, furnishing of English translation of judgments written in any language, speedy grant of copies of documents;

(iii) generally overseeing the functioning of the State Commission or the District Fora to ensure that the objects and purposes of the Act are best served without in any way interfering wi