SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LOKESHWAR PRASAD, RUMNITA MITTAL
GEETA WADHWA – Appellant
Versus
BHATIA GLOBAL HOSPITAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Prasad, President—The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), is directed against order dated 17.12.2002, passed by District Forum-III, Janakpuri, New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 512/2002 entitled — Ms. Geeta Wadhwa v. Bhatia Global Hospital & Anr.

2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the above mentioned appeal, lie in a narrow compass. The appellant Ms. Geeta Wadhwa, alleging deficiency in service on the part of the respondents, had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act, before the District Forum claiming damages to the extent of Rs. 2,00,000/-, refund of the amount of Rs. 19,320/- paid to the respondents and another sum of Rs. 11,000/- as litigation expenses.

3. The above mentioned complaint, filed by the appellant, has been dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of a statement made by the learned Counsel for the appellant before the District Forum on 17.12.2002.

4. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 15 of the Act.

5. We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant at length on the question of admissio











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top