M.S.RANE, R.N.VARHADI
JANASEVA SAHKARI BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
JYOTSNA SUDHAKAR PANDHYE – Respondent
Mr. Justice M.S. Rane, President—We are proceeding to dispose of these appeals with a common order at the stage of their admission itself on consideration of the materials made available in the appeal paper books and on hearing the learned Advocate for the appellants.
2. As a matter of fact the appeals filed is not a proper remedy. The same has been filed against the interim order passed by the District Forum disposing the preliminary objection raised by and on behalf of the present appellants who are O.Ps. in both the complaints. However, we are not sticking up to the technicality and proceeding to thrash out both appeals.
(For brevity’s sake appellants are hereinafter referred to as ‘Bank’ and respondents as ‘complainants’).
3. The Bank is the appellant in both the appeals which has taken exception to the order dated 27th August, 2002 passed by District Forum Pune in application moved by and on behalf of the Bank for dismissal of the complaints for want of jurisdiction which the District Forum has proceeded to reject the same and hence these appeals.
4. We perused the complaints wherein the factual aspects obtained is almost identical. In one complaint husband is the complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.