LOKESHWAR PRASAD, RUMNITA MITTAL, S.P.SABERWAL
DURGA BUILDERS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
USHA RANI – Respondent
Mr. S.P. Saberwal, Member—Since points of facts and law involved in all the above mentioned revision petitions are identical and these revision petitions arise out of a common order dated 8.2.2000 passed by South District Forum, these revision petitions, with the consent of the parties, have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The above mentioned revision petitions under Section 17(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) are directed against a common order dated 8.2.2000 passed by South District Forum in 13 complaint cases. The respondents in 13 cases are allottees of plots by Durga Builders. The dispute regarding payment of external development charges and the internal development charges in respect of certain allottees is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court had passed an order dated 2.12.1999 in I.A. Nos. 25-27 in C.W. (Civil) No. 113/1996, I.A. Nos. 6-7 in W.P. (C) 477/1996, I.A. Nos. 5-7 in W.P. (C) 792/1996 and I.A. Nos. 4 and 5 in W.P. (C) 876/1996 in case entitled - Okhla Enclave Joint Action Committee etc. v. U.O.I. & Ors., wherein certain directions have been given
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.