D.P.WADHWA, B.K.TAIMNI, K.S.GUPTA
MAYA DEVI KESHWANI – Appellant
Versus
M. P. HOUSING BOARD – Respondent
Mr. B.K. Taimni, Member—Petitioner was the complainant before the District Forum.
1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the complainant was allotted a house on 14.6.1999 whose estimated cost was Rs. 5,19,000/- and payment was as per Schedule under a Hire Purchase Scheme. While communicating the final cost, it was increased by Rs. 1,47,000/-. On seeing the house and on finding the house having certain defects, they were brought to the notice of the respondent. After removing the defects, possession of the house was handed over on 22.9.2001. Complainant objected to the enhanced price of the house as also interest added to the instalments till the delivery of the possession. It is in these circumstances that a complaint was filed by the petitioner before the District Forum alleging deficiency in service. District Forum after hearing the parties partly allowed the complaint. Not being satisfied with the reliefs granted by the District Forum, the petitioner filed an appeal before the State Commission, which was dismissed on merits, hence this Revision Petition.
2. We heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. Prayers of the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.