SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JASBIR SINGH, D.K.BHAMRAH, H.S.BRAR
JOT MATERNITY AND CHILDREN HOSPITAL – Appellant
Versus
SANJOGITTA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. Sanjeev Walia, Advocate.
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

Mr. Justice H.S. Brar, President—Both these Appeal Nos. 1186 of 2000 and 1165 of 2000, one filed by Jot Maternity and Children Hospital and the other filed by Sanjogitta are being disposed of by a single order as they have been filed against the same order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ropar (hereinafter called the District Forum) dated 1.9.2000.

2. Facts are being taken from Appeal No. 1186 of 2000. The main grievance of the complainant before the District Forum was that on 24.1.2000 at about 10.00 a.m., the respondent/complainant (hereinafter called the complainant) had developed gynaecological problem and was taken to the hospital run by the appellants/respondents (hereinafter called the respondents) and she was given intravenous injection which was wrongly injected and immediately after the complainant developed swelling and pain in left(L) fore-arm but the respondent did not care to take further medical steps inspite of the complaint made by the complainant but instead thereof the complainant was sent home and it was told by the respondent that the pain and swelling would automatically subside. The complainant developed severe pain at night and she was













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top