SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.DUBEY, B.L.KHARE, PRAMILA S.KUMAR
B. M. SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
TRACK ON LINE, NET-4 INDIA PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In person.
For the Respondent:Mr. Awadhesh Sharma and Mr. Anil Gupta, Advocates.

ORDER

Mr. Justice S.K. Dubey, President—This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.8.2001 passed in Case No. 765/2000 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gwalior (for short the “District Forum”) whereby the complaint to claim compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- for deficiency in service in not registering domain name by the respondent was dismissed holding that the District Forum at Gwalior had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.

2. Admittedly, in pursuance of the advertisement published in Times of India dated 5.7.2000 by the respondent in the caption “Welcome to Great Domains.com The World’s #1 Domain Name Marketplace Millions of Names Available for Sale”, the appellant sent an amount of Rs. 650/- by demand draft by registered post on 10.7.2000 to the respondent at Delhi for registering his domain name “Unique Trade.com”. However, the appellant received e-mail that the draft has not been received by it which be sent within a period of 20 days failing which the trade domain name will not be registered. The appellant thereafter sent a duplicate bank draft by registered AD post on 9.8.2000 at Delhi; acceptance of which was communicated on website























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top