SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.Y.KAWOOSA, VIDYA SAGAR
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
S. GURUCHARAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Vishnu Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

Mr. M.Y. Kawoosa, President—This appeal is directed against the order dated 23.8.2002 passed by the DF by virtue of which complaint of the complainant has been allowed and appellant/OP was directed to pay Rs. 99,874.00 with 9 per cent interest per annum 3 months from the date of loss and Rs. 5,000.00 as compensation.

2. Shorn of details, the case of complainant/respondent before the DF was that the complainant insured his residential house and secured a policy from 2nd March, 2000 to 1st March, 2001 for Rs. 6.00 lakhs. The said building was damaged due to floods. The damage was caused to the building, boundary wall, septic tank, underground sewerage system, compound retaining wall. Claim was resisted by the respondent. Appellant appointed Sai Consultants as Surveyor in order to assess the loss. Surveyor assessed the net loss to the tune of Rs. 41,449.00. It was recommended by the Surveyor that the claim was not payable so the respondent could not be indemnified because loss to the retaining wall was not covered. The appellant declared it ‘No Claim’ by repudiating it. Complainant filed the complaint before the DF where the OP resisted the claim and got the loss estimated by Sing






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top