M.A.A.KHAN, SUSHMA TANWAR
DAYANAND SINGH MODSARA – Appellant
Versus
GANPAT RAM – Respondent
Mr. Justice M.A.A. Khan, President—This appeal under Section 15 of the C.P. Act, 1986 (the ‘Act’), by a supplier of goods against the order of District Forum, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) dated 6.1.1999 arises under the following circumstances.
2. Respondent-complainant Nos. 1 to 3, are members of Scheduled Caste carrying on the profession of agriculture in a village of Jhunjhunu district. With a view to purchase a tractor with the agricultural loan to be obtained by them from the Co-operative Land Development Bank at Jhunjhunu, O.P.-respondent Nos. 4 and 5, they contacted the appellant, who is a dealer of “Swaraj” Tractors and carried on his said business in the business name and style of M/s. Shekhawati Auto Tractors and Spare Parts at Jhunjhunu. The appellant quoted the price at Rs. 2,53,090/- of a Swaraj 735 F.E. Tractor and the complainant deposited the quotation on 20.11.1995 with O.P.-respondent Nos. 4 and 5. A loan of Rs. 1,60,000/- was sanctioned to them on 30.11.1995 and they were required to deposit their share of price of tractor and other expenses amounting to Rs. 61,655/- and also to secure the debt with the mortgage of their deed of their immovable property. The complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.