SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.M.PATNAIK, ARATI MOHANTY, PRAMODNATH DAS
PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ORISSA CONSUMER ASSOCIATION – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. R.M. Patnaik, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice D.M. Patnaik, President—This appeal is at the instance of Peerless General Finance & Investment Company Limited (‘the Company’, for short) against the order of the District Forum, Malkangiri, directing refund of Rs. 27,587/- with interest.

2. The complainant took out an endowment policy of Rs. 1,68,000/- for a period of ten years. The proposal along with initial deposit was made on 20.4.1991. He claims to have paid Rs. 27,587/- towards premiums. It is his case that at the time of signing the proposal, he was given a wrong impression by the Agent of the Company that the insurance policy would also cover life risk. It is further his case that no policy/certificate in original was sent to him at all and, therefore, he was unaware of the terms and conditions of the policy. On 5.2.1997 he came to know that the policy was not to cover life risk and thus wanted to get back the deposited money.

3. The Company in its written version took various defences challenging the claim of the complainant. They deny the fact of their Agent giving out false representation that the policy would cover the life risk. They denied to have received certain portion of the amount claimed to have








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top