SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LOKESHWAR PRASAD, RUMNITA MITTAL
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE – Appellant
Versus
H. DEVRAJ – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Ghanshyam Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Prasad, President—The present appeal, filed by appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), is directed against order dated 18.2.2002, passed by District Forum-II, Udyog Sadan, Institutional Area, Mehrauli, New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 2165/1998 - entitled Shri H.Devraj v. Post Master General, New Delhi & Ors.

2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the respondent Shri H.Devraj had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum averring therein that the respondent, who is a poor driver, working with a Private Travel Agency, had remitted a sum of Rs. 700/- by money order to his mother, living in Mavungal House, Thirupuram, P.O. Neyyattinkara, District Thiruvanathapuram (Kerala) on 26.2.1998 from Defence Colony, New Delhi Post Office. It was stated that the above amount was remitted by means of money order to his 60 years old ailing mother so as to enable her to meet her medical and other day-to-day expenses. It was stated that the abovesaid money order sent by him was not delivered to his mother and on learning the above f









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top