SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

L.MANOHARAN, R.VIJAYA KRISHNAN
ASSISTANT SECRETARY, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD – Appellant
Versus
SUNDARAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. S.K. Vinod, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice L. Manoharan, President—Opposite party in O.P. 410/2001 on the file of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thrissur are the appellants. Complainant’s grievance for which he wanted redressal was, he availed a housing loan of Rs. 1,65,000/- that was the amount sanctioned by the opposite party, first instalment was Rs. 35,000/- and after deducting service charges complainant was given Rs. 33,250/- and it was followed by the second instalment. The instalments were given after deducting service charge, and the complainant is liable to pay only Rs. 1,65,000/- but when the complainant went for closing the loan, he realised that the principal amount is Rs. 1,75,000/-. He alleged deficiency in service and, therefore, wanted direction. The opposite party maintained that in fact the amount due was Rs. 1,75,000/- and as stated in the version balance is due from the complainant, they wanted dismissal of the complaint.

2. Before the District Forum complainant produced Exbts. P1 to P5 and the opposite party produced Exbts. R1 to R7. On a consideration of the said material the District Forum made the impugned direction to return Rs. 10,000/-. It is the said direction that is un







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top