SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.P.WADHWA, RAJYALAKSHMI RAO, B.K.TAIMNI
K. L. MALHOTRA – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner: In person.
For the Respondent: Nemo.

ORDER

Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa President—The matter has been called at second time. Nobody appears for the respondent. We, therefore, proceeded to hear the arguments of the petitioner who appeared in person.

2. Complainant is the petitioner before us. He is aggrieved by the order of the State Commission reducing the amount of compensation payable to him on account of the accident of his car which was comprehensively insured with the respondent-insurer. On a complaint filed by the complainant-petitioner, District Forum awarded him Rs. 34,519.27 against the insurer and Rs. 5,000/- against the respondent No. 2-opposite party No. 2 for delay in delivery of the car after repairs. State Commission while upholding the award of Rs. 5,000/- against the second respondent, reduced the amount of compensation that was awarded against insurer to Rs. 19,268/-.

3. Petitioner owned a Maruti Van which was insured with the respondent-insurer for the period from 8.5.1990 to 7.5.1991. It was involved in an accident on 9.2.1991. On the insurer being intimated, a Surveyor was appointed to survey the damaged vehicle who assessed damage at Rs. 20,868/-. Vehicle was given for repairs to the second respondent wh








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top